![]() [Index] [About] [Participants] [Forum] [Vote] [Letters] [Disclaimer] [Archive] |
|
|||
If you take the meetings of our foreign ministers and many other politicians, and if you weigh on the scales which question for the last two years is discussed the most, you would probably find it is about the former Yugoslavia, Karasin replied. Macedonia and Kosovo have been the key focus of these talks. The international community and the European Union are not happy, he explained, with the developments in the Balkans which bring one national group on top of another, and one religion on top of the other. He hopes that a solution will be found, while adding that there is much to do and that it will take time to create a modern civilised society in the region. Above all, in response to a similar question but about potential conflict in the Black Sea and Caspian Sea area, he outlined that Russia is not pursuing a confrontation line, but intends to work as a partner with NATO and the European Union countries to ensure peace and stability on the world stage. Financial Times correspondent, Glen Seagull, who raised concerns about Russias ability to reform economically and its central planning ability, raised the question. He fears that there is a security dilemma on the non-Cold War borders. His Excellency said that talks are under way with the five Caspian Sea countries, and that no-one should hurry. The solution to prevent conflict in these regions, Karasin suggested, is to approach things in a positive way by co-operating with other countries just like Russias approach towards European questions and problems. He was right to suggest that threats will not help. With respect to the Black Sea the question posed by the FT wasnt clear. So Karasin chose to emphasise that Russia has good economic and political relations with Turkey, particularly as it is a member of NATO. The confusion led Karasin to suggest that: nobody is trying to bring the Black Sea closer to Turkey or Russia. He hopes that everyone will work to prevent a war in these regions.
Winston Churchill once said in 1939 that Russia was a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma. On the other hand Bismarck had once commented that Russia is a never as strong or as weak as it looks. Karasin calls these classic clichés that describe Russia. He believes that both viewpoints are impressive and self-explanatory, but the key to both is mystery. This led Karasin to speak about a new openness in his country, which some might question. If Russia is truly open, then why was the countrys only independent television station NTVs take-over sanctioned by the state in January 2001? A BBC Online News report suggests that it was an attempt by the Russian government to silence the T.V stations criticisms of its actions in Chechnya and the Kursk submarine disaster. Russias newly found openness and predictably, H.E Grigory Karasin argues is the most important development for his country. There have been dramatic changes in the last ten years from an over centralised and ideology-based to a normal and understandable, by everyone, society, he added. He stressed that Russia is no longer a stagnant country, but is on the move, and there are obvious positive results that we have achieved. A pluralistic democracy, he explained, underlines the new Russia. He also argued that the present administrations totalitarian instincts, that beset the past, are exaggerated. Last years Russian presidential elections, and the trouble-free transition of power from Boris Yeltsin to Vladimir Putin were given as evidence of a young, and committed pluralistic democracy. Karasin described President Putin as dynamic and popular leader who formulates the priorities of the national agenda, and is persistently implementing the plans to review and modernise Russia. Yet as Putin sanctioned the take-over of NTV, Ambassador Grigory Karasins statement doesnt quite ring true about Russias democratic progress. The Russian government hopes, according to Karasin, that by strengthening the state with its greater openness and predictability that the country will be able to foster stronger relations with the 89 regions and the federal centre. He argues that a stronger state wont diminish democracy, but will ensure the same criteria of market economy and democratic reforms, secure financial and economic spheres, and the protection human rights all over the country. Russia and Europe continued... [About EuroPolls] [Index] [Participants] [EMU Forum] |