![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[Index] [About] [Participants] [Forum] [Vote] [Letters] [Disclaimer] |
![]() ![]() Real Media Video ![]() Former Conservative Party chairman, Lord Tebbit, rejects "ever closer union." Source: The European Foundation. ![]() Bill Rammell MP, leader of the Labour Group for Europe argues for "ever closer union." Footage courtesy of the European Foundation. Internet Links ![]() European Charter on Fundamental Rights ![]() BBC News Online. BBC On The Record The Euro: A High Price To Pay? ![]() EU Observer ![]() The Financial Times ![]() The Electronic Telegraph ![]() Department of Trade and Industry ![]() UK Foreign Office HM Treasury ![]() Street Britain in Europe ![]() UK Independence Party ![]() New Labour ![]() The Conservative Party ![]() Liberal Democrats ![]() The Scottish National Party ![]() The Institute Of Directors ![]() ![]() Democracy Movement ![]() PECP. ![]() Business for Sterling ![]() European Movement ![]() Opinion Polls |
|
Government Accused Of
The Tory leader mocked Prime Minister Tony Blair's denial of the EU's goals to assume such a status. Instead, perhaps contrary to the President of the European Commission Romano Prodi's call for a "government of Europe", Mr. Blair called for a "European Superpower." Ironically Mr. Prodi has countered Eurosceptics' fears of an encroaching Superstate. In The Daily Telegraph he said: "The EU brings sovereign nations and peoples closer together, giving them a common strength, greater than any one of them could possess alone. It is not about abolishing nationhood." Mr. Hague said the Government was not being straight about its European agenda. He cited examples of Tony Blair's about-turns on keeping the pound, and the Prime Minister's previous opposition to the idea of a single European army. The Government, he argued, is now clearly embracing the idea of giving up Britain's right to veto upon certain issues.
The foreign secretary put the case for increasing Qualified Majority Voting (QMV). BBC News Online quoted him on November 17th 2000 as saying: "Directives on banking and insurance that helped the City were opposed by other countries, which would have blocked them if there had been a veto." Eurosceptics would, however, argue that this proves the Government is handing British sovereignty to Brussels on a silver platter.
Dispelling what he calls "Euro-myths," Mr. Cook argued that the press should be putting forward a more "positive storyline" on the European Union. At the same time the Prime Minister outlined his view that it is possible to be pro-European, and a patriotic about being British. Yet with the euro still lacking strength and stability, the Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown has ruled out joining the euro for at least two years on economic grounds. A newly leaked Cabinet document has also re-ignited the Cabinet feud over Europe, and particularly its euro policy.
The Government's case for supporting the euro can't have been helped by further recent revelations. It is estimated that the switchover to the single currency would cost Britain an estimated £32 billion. Many therefore believe that scrapping the pound Sterling is too high a cost to bear upon the British economy. The pro-euro groups continue to preach doom and gloom, considering Britain's position outside the Eurozone. They argue that Britain will lose influence and vital foreign investment by keeping the pound. This argument, they believe, negates such a high cost. There's no doubt that William Hague would disagree.By Graham Jarvis, 19th November 2000 E-AG: The Foreign and Security Policy Implications of the Euro. [About EuroPolls] 
[Index] [Participants] [EMU Forum] |