The European Movement looks
at the Eurozone's Economic Outlook
The
European Movement has rebutted suggestions by
Eurosceptics that the EU's economy lags behind
the United States of America.
In a
recent weekly email update it cited the
Independent's article, "European economy
growing twice as fast as US", of 9th March
2001.
It
says that the EU is now growing twice as
fast the US economy, which has been affected by a
slowdown and a slight devaluation in the value of
the US dollar.The European Movement claims this
"is a firm rebuttal to those
'anti-Europeans' who have tried to portray [the
euro] as a failure."
As
part of its evidence that the European Union is
economically streaking ahead of the United
States, the European Movement quotes the EU's
official end of the year 2000 and International
Monetary Fund (IMF) statistics.
In
the email Chris Bradley, campaign director of the
European Movement, claims that "The economy
of the EU expanded by 0.7 percent in the final
quarter of last year compared to a growth rate of
US GDP of just 0.3 percent."
He
stresses that the EU's strong economic
performance "was put down to strong gains in
investment and exports." As a result of this eurozone
unemployment has fallen dramatically, according
the European Movement, from 11.5 percent to 8.8
percent in November 2000.
Chris
Bradley argues that this has created "No
fewer than six million jobs. He cites IMF predictions, to add weight to his claims, that
"US growth this year will only be 1.7
percent, while growth in the EU is expected to be
2.8 percent."
The
EU's economic performance as detailed by these
figures is also, he claims, allowing the core
eurozone countries to reduce their taxes. Taxes
are being cut by France, Germany and Italy who
provide 70 percent of the eurozone's Gross
Domestic Product (GDP).
The email ends: "The
anti-Europeans should start telling the truth
about the success of the European economy and
stop pretending that it is a failure."
In
the past few weeks the European Movement has also
produced comment on:
- The Daily Telegraph's article of 23rd February
2001, "Blair calls for closer EU ties with
Nafta." (23/02/01)
- The
BBC's programme called "Referendum
Street"
that carried out a mock referendum on whether the
British electorate could be persuaded to abolish
the pound for the euro. (16/02/01)
- The Daily Mail's article
of , 9th February 2001, 'Now Guthrie is going, he
attacks the Euro army.'
Steven
Coventry's response to comments made by Sir
Charles Guthrie, the former UK Chief of the Defence
Staff, who claimed "that unless
Europe bears its share of the cost of defence,
America is likely to pull back its forces." (09/02/01)
- The Guardian's article "Steel
yourselves" of 2nd February 2001, following
mass redundancies made by the Anglo-Dutch
consortium Corus Steel, formerly British Steel.
The European Movement blames the loss of 6,000
jobs on the strength of sterling, and Britain's
self-exclusion from the eurozone. (02/02/01)
- The Times's article of 19th January
2001, 'Europol prepares to enter a wider arena'
The Times (19/01/01).
- The
Evening Standard's article of 11th January 2001,
"EU fast-track rules boost UK service
sector." (12/01/01)
- The Daily Mirror's article of 5th January
2001, 'Vote for euro "more likely." An
excerpt of the email newsletter by Chris Bradley:
"The
anti-Europeans are in disarray. They have been
forced to cut back because they overspent their
budget and consequently had a row with one of
their two co-treasurers."
"The
result is a small group of people operating to an
emergency plan, casting around for spurious
economic arguments in an attempt to down-play the
rise of the euro, cutting back on campaigning and
forced to admit that public hostility towards the
euro is soft."(05/01/01)
For
more information email Chris Bradley.
 
|
The Democracy Movement
on
"Referendum Street"
Eurosceptics
picked up the pieces after the pro-euro camp won
a mock euro referendum on the BBC's Panorama
programme entitled "Referendum Street,"
broadcast on 18th February 2001. The experiment
was declared 'unscientific' from the outset with
respect to its approach and analysis.
The Democracy
Movement's Stuart Coster had "a walk on
part" in support of the eurosceptics
arguments against the abolition of sterling. Mr.
Coster wrote an email the following day giving
his response:
"I think we
have much to learn from the experience. It is
right to say that we don't really know how the
BBC selected the people who took part or whether
the pro-pound group got to see all the
undecideds/wavering pro-pounders."
He added:
"But to fuss over these questions is to duck
the real problem - the pro-pound message."
He put the eurosceptics defeat down to a matter
of targeting the type of people that took part in
the programme.
He said the Referendum
Street residents
are "people we
don't normally come into contact with, because
they don't engage with us or anything
political."
Yet, he continued,
they "make up the majority of people out
there. People not normally bothered enough about
the issue to come to meetings or talk to someone
at a stall in the street. Maybe not even enough
to read a leaflet which comes through their
door."
He believes that
the Referendum Street's residents characterise an
electorate that may have an opinion on whether to
keep the pound, or join the euro. Yet they can be
swayed either way because "they haven't
heard all the arguments."
The eurosceptics
on the programme were highly disppointed that
their points concerning the loss of British
democracy, if Britain signed up to the euro, did
not much concern most of the programmes
participants. The majority didn't also buy their
economic arguments.
Stuart Coster
analysed the reason behind the lack of interest
in the democratic and constitutional issues shown
by the majority of the Street's
"electorate." He said : "In their view they have no control
now, nothing changes now whatever way they
vote."
He elaborted by
saying, "sure they kicked the Tories out in
'97 but look what they got. They're all the same
so what's the difference in having the EU run
things?"
Eurosceptics have
been soul-searching since the programme was
broadcast. They are having work on a new strategy
to make sure that their arguments to keep the
pound actually mean something to the type of
people who participated in the "It's a
Knockout" styled documentary.
Mr. Coster
concluded: "We should be talking about
the JOBS that investment creates/safeguards. We
should be talking about the PRICE RISES that will
mean. And we don't talk nearly enough about the
threats to PUBLIC SPENDING. We need
to boil our arguments right down to "Keep
the Pound to Keep Your Job."
Democracy Movement
comment from the past few weeks:
- "European
army and political union were planned by
Nazis." An article by the Daily Telegraph's Michael Smith, Defence
Correspondent, which appeared on 15th February
2001. (15/02/01)
- "Goldsmith's
widow targets Europhiles." This Democracy
Movement
e-newsletter was sent to DM activists in response
to her interview with the BBC. She is planning a
"£500,000 campaign against pro-European
candidates at the general election in memory of
her late husband [Sir James Goldmsith]."
(15/01/01)
- "Goldsmith
widow carries on fight," By Rachel Sylvester
of the Daily Telegraph. An 'e-bulletin' of the
Democracy Movement that was sent out on 13th
January 2001. In the the bulletin she refutes any
suggestion that her family is anti-European.
She said: "We
just want people to know the truth," Lady
Annabel says. "I'm not anti-European - my
husband was half European and my children are a
quarter French."
The article also
reveals that 120 "target"
constituencies will receive a Democracy Movement
newspaper to reveal "the Euro-skeletons in
their candidate's closet."
A new Web site is
planned too. The Democracy Movement says this
will show the voting records of all sitting
MPs.(15/01/01)
For more
information email Stuart Coster.
|