BACK. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NEXT.

 

 

 

 

The caterpillar, sitting on a mushroom,

smoking a pipe, said," Who are you ? "

 

Alice responded, " I hardly know, sir, just at

the present. At least, I know who I was when

I got up in the morning, but I think I must

have changed several times since then."

 

" What do you mean by that ? " said the

caterpillar sternly." Explain yourself."

 

" I can't explain myself, I'm afraid sir,"

answered Alice, " I'm not myself, you see."

 

Changes, changes, changes, changes....

 

The creation of the eight trigrams of the

I Ching is attributed to a legendary sage,

Fu Shi, who is reputed to have lived about

five thousand years ago.

 

By studying the sky and land, animal tracks

and his own body, he devised the broken and

unbroken lines as symbols of the fundamental

nature of the universe.

From these, he constructed eight trigrams, each

of which stood for an aspect of nature, the

person themselves, and soceity.

 

The eight trigrams were later arranged into

the I Ching, or Book of Changes, by combining

pairs of them into sixty four hexagrams.

 

The yin-yang concept is at least as old as the

time of Fu Shi.

It is usually stated that the polarities of yin

and of yang exist everywhere, in everything.

A duality which penetrates all of nature.

However, at the ultimate meditative level of

union with the Tao, there is only unity, and

there are no polarised opposites.

Upon withdrawal from that unified condition

the initial distinction between the observer

and the observed, the subject and the object,

the self and all else, as ego re-emerges,

launches one back into the realm of

distinction and dichotomy. It is in this realm

that the interplay of yin and yang is said to

operate.

 

So, whether yin-yang is a polarity ' out there ',

or a binary opposition produced by the mind

or brain, is a question which rests already

upon the binary distinction between the

experiencer and the experience, between the

thinker and the thought.

 

From the perspective of unity with Tao, that

question cannot be posed, because there is no

questioner, no ' me ' to be distinguished in

opposition to a ' my experience '.

 

So Tao is the source, the origin, the ground,

from which yin and yang emanate.

 

Yin originally meant ' shady, dark, cold, secret,

mysterious '.

So, it would seem to have been conceived by

observing the north side, the surface of the

boulders, trees, and mountains which faces to

north, and where mosses and plants which

dislike direct sunlight grow. The side where

the frost and snow lingers longest.

That which lies hidden in shadow is

mysterious.

 

Yang meant ' clear, bright, the sun, heat ', so

the southern side of a mountain, or the

northern bank of a river or side of a ravine,

the aspect which catches the sun's rays.

When the light is bright one can see

everything clearly.

 

This primary opposition of qualities is then

extended to all else that exists.

Yin is dark, hidden, passive, receptive, yielding,

cool, soft, feminine.

Yang is illuminated, visible, active, aggressive,

dominating, hot, hard, masculine.

 

Although these opposed qualities can be

precisely distinguished, as in black versus

white, everything that exists is actually a

mixture of the two. Shades of grey. This is

elicited in the yin-yang symbol, black and

white separated by a flowing S-shape, as

a black dot upon the white, and a white dot

upon the black.

The emblematic dot means that everything

contains within it, the seed, the potential, of

its opposite, its partnered quality.

 

Like the Greek philosophers Heraclitus and

Anaximander, the Taoist understanding of

change is by way of one opposite replacing

the other, just as day becomes night then

becomes day again, and the ocean tide ebbs

and flows.

 

So the flowing of Tao is an endless and

perpetual oscillation between the twin poles

of yin and yang, each moving toward and

then becoming its opposite before beginning

the inevitable return cycle.

 

As a pre-scientific experiential insight, I think

that this is a most profound understanding.

Some scientists will scoff, and sneer, because

their worldview is so very much more

' sophisticated ', but I would point out that

this extremely ancient wisdom has made its

mark upon the history of science. One of the

earliest champions of the binary system of

counting - the zeros and ones which allow

your computer and the internet - was

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.

 

In 1666, aged 20, Leibniz wrote what he

called, ultra modestly, a schoolboy's essay,

titled ' De Arte Combinatoria ' , ' On the Art

of Combination '.

This work laid out a general method for

reducing all thinking - of any sort, on any

subject - to perfect exactitude, by transposition

from the verbal format, with all its scope for

ambiguity, into the mathematical format,

where the relationships involved in statements

can be defined precisely.

 

Leibniz's paper was ignored, and he himself

did not pursue the invention of the new

language, but a decade later he came upon

a version of the I Ching, which spurred his

work on refining the binary system, whose

' either / or ' propositions are familiar to every

computer programmer today.

 

Leibniz believed that the number one

represented God, and zero represented the

Void, that is, the universe before anything

other than God existed.

From one and zero, - God and the Void -,

springs everything, just as one and zero

can be used, via the binary system of

counting, to express all possible

mathematical ideas.

 

 

TOP. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NEXT.