BACK. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NEXT.

 

 

 

They were led out to execution at the

Smithfield, on July 30, 1540.

 

To show how ' impartial ' justice was, it was

decreed that three Lutherans, by name of

Barnes, Garret, and Jerome, who had been

convicted of heresy, should suffer with them.

 

Powell and Barnes were old antagonists, and

Powell had written a pamphlet repudiating

Barnes allegation that Catholics were disloyal.

All six complained that they had had no

trial of any kind.

 

Three hurdles were requisitioned, and on each

one of them, side by side, and tied together,

were bound a Lutheran and a Catholic, to the

huge amusement of the spectators.

 

They were dragged to Smithfield, where the

Lutherans were burned alive as heretics.

 

Powell and his two companions were hung,

and, while still alive, taken down, mutilated,

and disembowelled, then decapitated and

quartered.

Their quarters were distributed among the

gates of the City, and their heads impaled

on London Bridge.

 

The French Ambassador, writing to his King,

remarked of the incident : " They have quaint

ways of managing things in England; those

who are for the Pope are hanged, and those

who are against him are burnt."

 

Edward Powell, ' the glory of Oxford ', was

aged 72, when he died that horrible death.

He was beatified in 1886, that is, the Pope

declared him to be in enjoyment of

heavenly bliss, the first step toward official

recognition as a martyr.

 

I have quoted this long narrative, because, as

I see it, this is a typical example of the kind

of political power struggle that epitomises the

nature of human soceities, from Sumeria up

to the present day. Indeed, there are some

almost exact parallels on the news today,

from several countries, and no doubt, many

others going on in the background, which

don't make the headlines.

 

If you have the power, like King Henry, then

you can interpret ' the rules ' in whatever

manner you wish.

 

Edward Powell, with remarkable courage or

rashness, asserted that the authority of the

Church was above that of the King.

 

But what right had the Church ? He meant,

of course, the Roman Catholic Church, headed

by the Pope in Rome, who bases his authority

upon the Petrine succession. That is, he was

Bishop of Rome, and, as such, successor of

St. Peter, the vicar, or vice-regent, and disciple

of Jesus Christ, who was martyred in Rome

in 67 A.D.

Of course, the Pope's claim to that position

of authority has always been rejected by the

Churches of the Eastern Orthodox rite based

at Byzantium ( Constantinople, now Istanbul.)

 

So, depending upon your interpretation, the

Pope's authority is also questionable.

And, of course, during Powell's lifetime,

Martin Luther, an Augustinian monk, was

challenging the supreme authority of the

Pope, and initiating the Reformation, tearing

Europe apart, and setting up enmities which

still revebrate today, nearly five hundred years

later.

 

The Pope, of course, made up his own

interpretation of the ' rules ' , marketing and

selling ' indulgences ' ( ' if you pay me cash,

I'll make sure that your sins are forgiven, so

that when you die, you end up in Heaven,

rather than suffering eternal torment ' - a

rather eccentric interpretation of the New

Testament, possibly ? ) so that he could

raise the funds for his pet ego trip, St. Peter's

in Rome.

 

At the beginning of his reign, King Henry

had married Catherine of Aragon, his brother's

widow. Because of some ecclesiastical dispute

about the validity of such a union, he was

forced to acquire a Papal dispensation.

Nearly twenty years later, when he wanted to

divorce Catherine, the Pope was unwilling to

agree, partly because Rome was in the hands

of Catherine's nephew, Emperor Charles V

 

Finally Henry overthrew Papal jurisdiction,

allowing his divorce, allowing himself the

revenues and lands of the monasteries and

churches previously dedicated to Rome, and

initiating the English Reformation. A new set

of rules for everyone, and yet another cycle

of re-interpretation of what Christ actually

meant, taught, and stood for, and what it

meant to be ' a Christian ', something which

all the characters in this unsavoury tale

would have insisted that they themselves

were.

 

Or perhaps you interpret this text rather

differently ?

 

 

TOP. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NEXT.