What About the Crusade?
by the Session of Shettleston Free Church of Scotland (1994)
The following article was produced as a response to questions arising
from the Billy Graham crusades. It serves as a reminder that the errors
in evangelism which arose last century are still with us today - and
more so. Then as now, Reformed men were too willing to countenance
unscriptural techniques in order to obtain the results which they
desired. We are indebted to the Session of Shettleston Free Church of
Scotland for permission to reprint the material. The lesson to be
learned is that the Church should be more careful to heed and obey her
Lord in all that He has commanded: rather than the spiritual "quick
fix" of revival much touted today, repentance and reformation according
to the teachings of the Word of God are the great needs of the hour. We
may say also that the well-documented and unbiblical ecumenical
associations of Billy Graham go far beyond anything that Moody was
guilty of!
This article was published in the
Presbyterian Standard, Issue No. 4, October-December 1996.
What do you mean by "Crusade"?
A crusade is a 'holy war'. The name has been taken over in the last
hundred years for an organized series of large public meetings. They
are held round one well-publicized preacher.
Has not the Church always had these big meetings?
No. 'Crusades' are something very recent in the Church. Large
gatherings of people to hear preachers have often happened in history,
but not on the same organization and doctrine.
What is the difference in 'Crusades'?
Modern 'Crusades' are based on a different theology from that held by our Reformers or preachers of the 18th Century Revival.
Revivalism
is the word used for the new system. Reformed doctrine teaches that the
Church needs to follow only the programme laid down in the Scripture,
and that, depending in faith upon the promises of our Sovereign God, we
will be blessed with Revival.
Do not Revivalists believe the same thing?
Many revivalists are good Christians, but they tend to believe that the
blessing of revival can be brought about by the crusade-technique. The
Crusades of revivalism began with Charles Finney in the U.S.A. He
taught that revival was not the sovereign blessing of God upon the ordinary life and worship of the Church.
Finney, an Arminian, denied the Reformed doctrine of sovereign grace,
and said that at his great meetings people could be persuaded to "make
a decision for Christ". He insisted that a revival could be organized. This doctrine of revival gained
popularity in the U.S.A. and here, and there have been many big
campaigns since then. They began in Scotland with Moody and Sankey.
What difference does the doctrine make so long as the Gospel is preached?
The acceptance of Arminianism has poisoned the life of the Church.
Since blessing was promised independently of the faithful, steady use
of the ordinary means of grace, these biblical
ordinances have been neglected. Systematic study and preaching of the
Word and a close adherence to the biblical ways of worship have been
neglected and even scorned as 'old-fashioned' and 'dead'. A 'free and
easy' way expected great successes. The Shorter Catechism, a proven
tool of biblical training, was jettisoned.
May not Reformed Christians take part although they do not accept Arminian doctrine?
Some good people think this way. But we cannot separate the
doctrine from the
practice.
Revivalism contains some false views, and these have shaped its
methods. Often one hears Reformed preachers using Arminian persuasions
or methods; but in this they are being inconsistent.
But have not crusades been the cause of much blessing?
Even if crusades had been successful, they still could not be right if
they went against Scripture. But, in any case, although some people
have been converted, they [i.e., the Revivalism Crusades] have not produced blessing in the Church, but disaster !
How are crusades unscriptural?
They are against Scripture in their Arminian belief that men are not so
spiritually dead that they cannot find God for themselves. They teach
that Christ died for all men, and so it is mere human choice that keeps
men from being Christians, and it is only the individual who decides
that God may apply the blessings of Christ's Atonement to himself, NOT
GOD! Thus human persuasion, in the right atmosphere, can bring people
to have faith in Christ. This has led the Church to applaud 'great
preachers', rather than depend humbly on God's Word as it is regularly
expounded, in the ordinary life of the Church. Crusades emphasize in
their methods:—
-
A rousing atmosphere
created by choirs and bands.
-
Gospel addresses
that leave out much of the whole counsel of God.
-
Calls to the front
which try to get people to make a decision after which the organizers can work.
-
Inexperienced counsellors who give simple advice to
'enquirers' who are complete strangers to them.
Why has Revivalism been a 'disaster'?
It has weaned folk off true Gospel methods and doctrine. People have
been led to despise thorough study of doctrine, and so made them a prey
to dangers like charismaticism. Scotland is now in theological chaos,
and the Church spiritually weaker than it has been since the
Reformation. The main remedy for the results of revivalism to many of
our brethren tends to be more revivalism ! With a century and more of 'revivalism' no true revival has appeared in Scotland.
What should we do about Billy?
We are embarrassed to criticize the sincere efforts of good Christians.
But there is probably nothing that a Reformed Christian can do within
the system. Perhaps our best contributions are prayer for real revival,
which must come from a wholehearted turning to "wait upon the Lord",
meekly hearing his Word, and having the priorities for activity that
the Bible itself gives. This, of course involves us in examining our
own failures in following God's Word.
We must tactfully point out
that crusades have been generally selfdefeating, and that experience
shows that powerful revivals in our history ALWAYS come through other
means that revivalism: usually the ordinary weekly activities laid down
by God Himself in the Word.
Revivalism has a history of
fantasy. Living in illusions is always unhealthy for anyone, and
especially damaging for the life of the Church. |